
Seems like there is a sneaky bit of marketing going on with social media sites and educational technology companies. If I’m not mistaken, more and more colleagues are being asked to do ‘positive promotion’ (yes, I’m being diplomatic with my chosen language here) when using social media in exchange for badges of notification, beta-testing of software or free CPD. This isn’t new in itself; the most prominent example of this is the Apple ATI event where training takes place and you and your school are marketed at – not so bad as you wouldn’t attend the event if your school wasn’t thinking of investing in equipment. A spin off of this is the Apple Distinguished Educator badge (ADE) that started in the States as a notifier for internal school CPD knowledge and peer sharing.
Being an ADE involves 4 primary roles – advocate, advisor, author and ambassador. Each is connected to our relationship with Apple and the devices we use in our teaching and learning.
Advocate – passionate users of Apple technologies and able to present to others how to use these tools in education
Advisor – feedback to Apple how these technologies influence education
Author – publish examples of work using Apple technologies for others to learn from and use
Ambassador – build global communities to “expand the walls of the classroom”
Usually mac fans (I am one) are pretty evangelical about the kit anyway so its not such a stretch to be an Advocate. When does this come down to sales and renewed contracts though? In my experience of running ATI events there is an element of bums on seats and if there isn’t the interest then your badge can be transferred to a rival organisation… you shouldn’t need the badge to be able to run a free CPD event. But then. you don’t get access to gratis kit and or beta software either.
Other companies are following suite in this way (Microsoft Accreditation obviously, AutoDesk, Google Teacher Academy amongst others). What is developing now is the way the advocation is being pursued using social media sites in very subtle ways (owing much to Internet marketing techniques) and not obviously positive promotion either. Some examples: the hashtag for ukedchat is attached to social media discussions on Twitter for UK Education. On one occasion the discussion was moderated by a company offering educational awards and the subject was: Educational Awards! So blatant a promotion (even if not intended) that there was cyber-outrage…
Where does this stop? Google Teacher Academy ‘graduates’ discussing how useful Picasa is at opportune moments? It is neither the most user friendly or cheapest online photo storage service so should be discussed in the context of other services surely… maybe I’m reading too much into this trend of product placement but if it isn’t with us now it certainly will be soon…
Extract from sales banter:
Do you know where to find your target market?
Do you know what your message is?
Many people jump into social media marketing without any kind of action plan. They jump on the bandwagon and start Tweeting their message to anyone who will listen, hoping that it will land on captive ears. And, they turn off many potential friends and ambassadors in the process.
Now consider this in terms of your social media discussions of products and services – as tweeting teachers you are a potential market to be (subtly) exploited! Nuff’ said.
Posted by damoward 





